Volumetric flow rate.
Metric teaspoon per Hours to Centiliters per Fortnight Converter — metric tsp/h to cL/fn
Convert Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) to Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric teaspoon per hours = 168 centiliter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric teaspoon per Hours to Centiliters per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.38888889e-9 / 8.26719577e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric teaspoon per Hours to Centiliters per Fortnight
Metric teaspoon per Hours and Centiliter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliters per fortnight = metric teaspoon per hours × 168
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric teaspoon per hours equals 1.388889e-9 base units, and 1 centiliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric teaspoon per hours-to-centiliter per fortnight factor of 168.
Simple example
1 metric tsp/h × 168 = 168 cL/fn
1 metric teaspoon per hours = 168 centiliters per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 metric tsp/h × 168 = 10,080 cL/fn
60 metric teaspoon per hours = 10,080 centiliters per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) | Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric tsp/h | 16.8 cL/fn |
| 1 metric tsp/h | 168 cL/fn |
| 10 metric tsp/h | 1,680 cL/fn |
| 60 metric tsp/h | 10,080 cL/fn |
| 100 metric tsp/h | 16,800 cL/fn |
| 1,000 metric tsp/h | 168,000 cL/fn |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Fortnight to Metric teaspoon per Hours
168 cL/fn × 0.005952380952 = 1 metric tsp/h
168 centiliters per fortnight = 1 metric teaspoon per hours.
metric teaspoon per hours = centiliters per fortnight × 0.00595238095238
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Fortnight to Metric teaspoon per Hours.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliters per fortnight are in 1 metric teaspoon per hours?
1 metric teaspoon per hours equals 168 centiliters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per hours to centiliter per fortnight?
Multiply the metric teaspoon per hours value by 168. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per fortnight back to metric teaspoon per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per fortnight equals 0.005952381 metric teaspoon per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric teaspoon per hours?
Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per fortnight?
Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric teaspoon per hours to centiliter per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric teaspoon per hours and centiliter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 168 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.