Volumetric flow rate.
Metric teaspoon per Hours to Cubic inch per Weeks Converter — metric tsp/h to in3/wk
Convert Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) to Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric teaspoon per hours = 51.25994504 cubic inch per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric teaspoon per Hours to Cubic inch per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.38888889e-9 / 2.70950132e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric teaspoon per Hours to Cubic inch per Weeks
Metric teaspoon per Hours and Cubic inch per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inch per weeks = metric teaspoon per hours × 51.2599450396
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric teaspoon per hours equals 1.388889e-9 base units, and 1 cubic inch per weeks equals 2.709501e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric teaspoon per hours-to-cubic inch per weeks factor of 51.2599450396.
Simple example
1 metric tsp/h × 51.25994504 = 51.25994504 in3/wk
1 metric teaspoon per hours = 51.25994504 cubic inch per weeks.
Real-world example
60 metric tsp/h × 51.25994504 = 3,075.596702 in3/wk
60 metric teaspoon per hours = 3,075.596702 cubic inch per weeks.
Conversion table
| Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) | Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric tsp/h | 5.125994504 in3/wk |
| 1 metric tsp/h | 51.25994504 in3/wk |
| 10 metric tsp/h | 512.5994504 in3/wk |
| 60 metric tsp/h | 3,075.596702 in3/wk |
| 100 metric tsp/h | 5,125.994504 in3/wk |
| 1,000 metric tsp/h | 51,259.94504 in3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Hours
51.25994504 in3/wk × 0.01950840952 = 1 metric tsp/h
51.25994504 cubic inch per weeks = 1 metric teaspoon per hours.
metric teaspoon per hours = cubic inch per weeks × 0.0195084095238
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Hours.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inch per weeks are in 1 metric teaspoon per hours?
1 metric teaspoon per hours equals 51.25994504 cubic inch per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per hours to cubic inch per weeks?
Multiply the metric teaspoon per hours value by 51.25994504. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per weeks back to metric teaspoon per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per weeks equals 0.0195084095 metric teaspoon per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric teaspoon per hours?
Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per weeks?
Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric teaspoon per hours to cubic inch per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric teaspoon per hours and cubic inch per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 51.25994504 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.