Volumetric flow rate.
Metric teaspoons per Millisecond to Bushel per Weeks Converter — metric tsp/ms to bu/wk
Convert Metric teaspoon per Millisecond (metric tsp/ms) to Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric teaspoon per millisecond = 85,813.84201 bushel per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric teaspoons per Millisecond to Bushel per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.005 / 5.82656583e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric teaspoons per Millisecond to Bushel per Weeks
Metric teaspoon per Millisecond and Bushel per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per weeks = metric teaspoons per millisecond × 85813.8420134
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric teaspoon per millisecond equals 0.005 base units, and 1 bushel per weeks equals 5.826566e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric teaspoon per millisecond-to-bushel per weeks factor of 85813.8420134.
Simple example
1 metric tsp/ms × 85813.84201 = 85,813.84201 bu/wk
1 metric teaspoon per millisecond = 85,813.84201 bushel per weeks.
Real-world example
60 metric tsp/ms × 85813.84201 = 5,148,830.521 bu/wk
60 metric teaspoons per millisecond = 5,148,830.521 bushel per weeks.
Conversion table
| Metric teaspoon per Millisecond (metric tsp/ms) | Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric tsp/ms | 8,581.384201 bu/wk |
| 1 metric tsp/ms | 85,813.84201 bu/wk |
| 10 metric tsp/ms | 858,138.4201 bu/wk |
| 60 metric tsp/ms | 5,148,830.521 bu/wk |
| 100 metric tsp/ms | 8,581,384.201 bu/wk |
| 1,000 metric tsp/ms | 85,813,842.01 bu/wk |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Millisecond
1 bu/wk × 0.00001165313167 = 0.0000116531 metric tsp/ms
1 bushel per weeks = 0.0000116531 metric teaspoons per millisecond.
metric teaspoons per millisecond = bushel per weeks × 0.0000116531316689
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Millisecond.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Millisecond (metric tsp/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per weeks are in 1 metric teaspoon per millisecond?
1 metric teaspoon per millisecond equals 85,813.84201 bushel per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per millisecond to bushel per weeks?
Multiply the metric teaspoon per millisecond value by 85813.84201. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per weeks back to metric teaspoon per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per weeks equals 0.0000116531 metric teaspoons per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric teaspoon per millisecond?
Metric teaspoon per Millisecond (metric tsp/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per weeks?
Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric teaspoon per millisecond to bushel per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric teaspoon per millisecond and bushel per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 85813.84201 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.