Volumetric flow rate.
Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds Converter — metric tsp/wk to cL/s
Convert Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) to Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 8.267196e-7 centiliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-12 / 1e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds
Metric teaspoon per Weeks and Centiliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per seconds = metric teaspoon per weeks × 8.267196e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 8.267196e-12 base units, and 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric teaspoon per weeks-to-centiliter per seconds factor of 8.267196e-7.
Simple example
1 metric tsp/wk × 8.267196e-7 = 8.267196e-7 cL/s
1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 8.267196e-7 centiliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 metric tsp/wk × 8.267196e-7 = 0.0000496032 cL/s
60 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.0000496032 centiliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) | Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric tsp/wk | 8.267196e-8 cL/s |
| 1 metric tsp/wk | 8.267196e-7 cL/s |
| 10 metric tsp/wk | 0.0000082672 cL/s |
| 60 metric tsp/wk | 0.0000496032 cL/s |
| 100 metric tsp/wk | 0.000082672 cL/s |
| 1,000 metric tsp/wk | 0.0008267196 cL/s |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Seconds to Metric teaspoon per Weeks
8.267196e-7 cL/s × 1209600 = 1.000000028 metric tsp/wk
8.267196e-7 centiliter per seconds = 1.000000028 metric teaspoon per weeks.
metric teaspoon per weeks = centiliter per seconds × 1209600
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Seconds to Metric teaspoon per Weeks.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per seconds are in 1 metric teaspoon per weeks?
1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 8.267196e-7 centiliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per weeks to centiliter per seconds?
Multiply the metric teaspoon per weeks value by 8.267196e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds back to metric teaspoon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 1,209,600 metric teaspoon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric teaspoon per weeks?
Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric teaspoon per weeks to centiliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric teaspoon per weeks and centiliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 8.267196e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.