Volumetric flow rate.
Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic foot per Hours Converter — metric tsp/wk to ft3/h
Convert Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) to Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.000001051 cubic foot per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic foot per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-12 / 7.86579072e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic foot per Hours
Metric teaspoon per Weeks and Cubic foot per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per hours = metric teaspoon per weeks × 0.00000105103174766
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 8.267196e-12 base units, and 1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.00000786579072 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric teaspoon per weeks-to-cubic foot per hours factor of 0.00000105103174766.
Simple example
1 metric tsp/wk × 0.000001051031748 = 0.000001051 ft3/h
1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.000001051 cubic foot per hours.
Real-world example
60 metric tsp/wk × 0.000001051031748 = 0.0000630619 ft3/h
60 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.0000630619 cubic foot per hours.
Conversion table
| Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) | Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric tsp/wk | 1.051032e-7 ft3/h |
| 1 metric tsp/wk | 0.000001051 ft3/h |
| 10 metric tsp/wk | 0.0000105103 ft3/h |
| 60 metric tsp/wk | 0.0000630619 ft3/h |
| 100 metric tsp/wk | 0.0001051032 ft3/h |
| 1,000 metric tsp/wk | 0.0010510317 ft3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Hours to Metric teaspoon per Weeks
0.000001051 ft3/h × 951446.0455 = 0.9999697938 metric tsp/wk
0.000001051 cubic foot per hours = 0.9999697938 metric teaspoon per weeks.
metric teaspoon per weeks = cubic foot per hours × 951446.045491
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Hours to Metric teaspoon per Weeks.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per hours are in 1 metric teaspoon per weeks?
1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 0.000001051 cubic foot per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per weeks to cubic foot per hours?
Multiply the metric teaspoon per weeks value by 0.000001051031748. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per hours back to metric teaspoon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per hours equals 951,446.0455 metric teaspoon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric teaspoon per weeks?
Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per hours?
Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric teaspoon per weeks to cubic foot per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric teaspoon per weeks and cubic foot per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000001051031748 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.