Volumetric flow rate.
Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic inch per Hours Converter — metric tsp/wk to in3/h
Convert Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) to Cubic inch per Hours (in3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.0018161829 cubic inch per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic inch per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-12 / 4.55196222e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic inch per Hours
Metric teaspoon per Weeks and Cubic inch per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inch per hours = metric teaspoon per weeks × 0.00181618285996
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 8.267196e-12 base units, and 1 cubic inch per hours equals 4.551962e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric teaspoon per weeks-to-cubic inch per hours factor of 0.00181618285996.
Simple example
1 metric tsp/wk × 0.00181618286 = 0.0018161829 in3/h
1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.0018161829 cubic inch per hours.
Real-world example
60 metric tsp/wk × 0.00181618286 = 0.1089709716 in3/h
60 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.1089709716 cubic inch per hours.
Conversion table
| Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) | Cubic inch per Hours (in3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric tsp/wk | 0.0001816183 in3/h |
| 1 metric tsp/wk | 0.0018161829 in3/h |
| 10 metric tsp/wk | 0.0181618286 in3/h |
| 60 metric tsp/wk | 0.1089709716 in3/h |
| 100 metric tsp/wk | 0.181618286 in3/h |
| 1,000 metric tsp/wk | 1.81618286 in3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Hours to Metric teaspoon per Weeks
0.0018161829 in3/h × 550.6053504 = 1.000000022 metric tsp/wk
0.0018161829 cubic inch per hours = 1.000000022 metric teaspoon per weeks.
metric teaspoon per weeks = cubic inch per hours × 550.6053504
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Hours to Metric teaspoon per Weeks.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Hours (in3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inch per hours are in 1 metric teaspoon per weeks?
1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 0.0018161829 cubic inch per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per weeks to cubic inch per hours?
Multiply the metric teaspoon per weeks value by 0.00181618286. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per hours back to metric teaspoon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per hours equals 550.6053504 metric teaspoon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric teaspoon per weeks?
Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per hours?
Cubic inch per Hours (in3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric teaspoon per weeks to cubic inch per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric teaspoon per weeks and cubic inch per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00181618286 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.