Volumetric flow rate.
Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Weeks Converter — metric tsp/wk to m3/wk
Convert Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) to Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.000005 cubic meter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-12 / 1.65343915e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Weeks
Metric teaspoon per Weeks and Cubic Meter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meter per weeks = metric teaspoon per weeks × 0.000005
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 8.267196e-12 base units, and 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric teaspoon per weeks-to-cubic meter per weeks factor of 0.000005.
Simple example
1 metric tsp/wk × 0.000005 = 0.000005 m3/wk
1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.000005 cubic meter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 metric tsp/wk × 0.000005 = 0.0003 m3/wk
60 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.0003 cubic meter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) | Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric tsp/wk | 5e-7 m3/wk |
| 1 metric tsp/wk | 0.000005 m3/wk |
| 10 metric tsp/wk | 0.00005 m3/wk |
| 60 metric tsp/wk | 0.0003 m3/wk |
| 100 metric tsp/wk | 0.0005 m3/wk |
| 1,000 metric tsp/wk | 0.005 m3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Weeks
0.000005 m3/wk × 200000 = 1 metric tsp/wk
0.000005 cubic meter per weeks = 1 metric teaspoon per weeks.
metric teaspoon per weeks = cubic meter per weeks × 200000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Weeks.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meter per weeks are in 1 metric teaspoon per weeks?
1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 0.000005 cubic meter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per weeks to cubic meter per weeks?
Multiply the metric teaspoon per weeks value by 0.000005. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks back to metric teaspoon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 200,000 metric teaspoon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric teaspoon per weeks?
Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric teaspoon per weeks to cubic meter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric teaspoon per weeks and cubic meter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000005 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.