Volumetric flow rate.
Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Microliter per Seconds Converter — metric tsp/wk to uL/s
Convert Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) to Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.0082671958 microliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Microliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-12 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Microliter per Seconds
Metric teaspoon per Weeks and Microliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
microliter per seconds = metric teaspoon per weeks × 0.0082671957672
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 8.267196e-12 base units, and 1 microliter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric teaspoon per weeks-to-microliter per seconds factor of 0.0082671957672.
Simple example
1 metric tsp/wk × 0.008267195767 = 0.0082671958 uL/s
1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.0082671958 microliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 metric tsp/wk × 0.008267195767 = 0.496031746 uL/s
60 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.496031746 microliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) | Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric tsp/wk | 0.0008267196 uL/s |
| 1 metric tsp/wk | 0.0082671958 uL/s |
| 10 metric tsp/wk | 0.0826719577 uL/s |
| 60 metric tsp/wk | 0.496031746 uL/s |
| 100 metric tsp/wk | 0.8267195767 uL/s |
| 1,000 metric tsp/wk | 8.267195767 uL/s |
Reverse conversion: Microliter per Seconds to Metric teaspoon per Weeks
0.0082671958 uL/s × 120.96 = 1.000000004 metric tsp/wk
0.0082671958 microliter per seconds = 1.000000004 metric teaspoon per weeks.
metric teaspoon per weeks = microliter per seconds × 120.96
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Microliter per Seconds to Metric teaspoon per Weeks.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Microliter per Seconds (uL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many microliter per seconds are in 1 metric teaspoon per weeks?
1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 0.0082671958 microliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per weeks to microliter per seconds?
Multiply the metric teaspoon per weeks value by 0.008267195767. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert microliter per seconds back to metric teaspoon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 microliter per seconds equals 120.96 metric teaspoon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric teaspoon per weeks?
Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a microliter per seconds?
Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric teaspoon per weeks to microliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric teaspoon per weeks and microliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.008267195767 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.