Volumetric flow rate.
Metric teaspoon per Years to Centiliter per Weeks Converter — metric tsp/yr to cL/wk
Convert Metric teaspoon per Years (metric tsp/yr) to Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric teaspoon per years = 0.0095826745 centiliter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric teaspoon per Years to Centiliter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.58443693e-13 / 1.65343915e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric teaspoon per Years to Centiliter per Weeks
Metric teaspoon per Years and Centiliter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per weeks = metric teaspoon per years × 0.00958267452446
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric teaspoon per years equals 1.584437e-13 base units, and 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric teaspoon per years-to-centiliter per weeks factor of 0.00958267452446.
Simple example
1 metric tsp/yr × 0.009582674524 = 0.0095826745 cL/wk
1 metric teaspoon per years = 0.0095826745 centiliter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 metric tsp/yr × 0.009582674524 = 0.5749604715 cL/wk
60 metric teaspoon per years = 0.5749604715 centiliter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Metric teaspoon per Years (metric tsp/yr) | Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric tsp/yr | 0.0009582675 cL/wk |
| 1 metric tsp/yr | 0.0095826745 cL/wk |
| 10 metric tsp/yr | 0.0958267452 cL/wk |
| 60 metric tsp/yr | 0.5749604715 cL/wk |
| 100 metric tsp/yr | 0.9582674524 cL/wk |
| 1,000 metric tsp/yr | 9.582674524 cL/wk |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Years
0.0095826745 cL/wk × 104.355 = 0.9999999974 metric tsp/yr
0.0095826745 centiliter per weeks = 0.9999999974 metric teaspoon per years.
metric teaspoon per years = centiliter per weeks × 104.355
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Years.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Years (metric tsp/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per weeks are in 1 metric teaspoon per years?
1 metric teaspoon per years equals 0.0095826745 centiliter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per years to centiliter per weeks?
Multiply the metric teaspoon per years value by 0.009582674524. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks back to metric teaspoon per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 104.355 metric teaspoon per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric teaspoon per years?
Metric teaspoon per Years (metric tsp/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric teaspoon per years to centiliter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric teaspoon per years and centiliter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.009582674524 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.