Volumetric flow rate.
Metric teaspoon per Years to Cubic inch per Days Converter — metric tsp/yr to in3/d
Convert Metric teaspoon per Years (metric tsp/yr) to Cubic inch per Days (in3/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric teaspoon per years = 0.0008353867 cubic inch per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric teaspoon per Years to Cubic inch per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.58443693e-13 / 1.89665093e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric teaspoon per Years to Cubic inch per Days
Metric teaspoon per Years and Cubic inch per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inch per days = metric teaspoon per years × 0.000835386682748
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric teaspoon per years equals 1.584437e-13 base units, and 1 cubic inch per days equals 1.896651e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric teaspoon per years-to-cubic inch per days factor of 0.000835386682748.
Simple example
1 metric tsp/yr × 0.0008353866827 = 0.0008353867 in3/d
1 metric teaspoon per years = 0.0008353867 cubic inch per days.
Real-world example
60 metric tsp/yr × 0.0008353866827 = 0.050123201 in3/d
60 metric teaspoon per years = 0.050123201 cubic inch per days.
Conversion table
| Metric teaspoon per Years (metric tsp/yr) | Cubic inch per Days (in3/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 metric tsp/yr | 0.0000835387 in3/d |
| 1 metric tsp/yr | 0.0008353867 in3/d |
| 10 metric tsp/yr | 0.0083538668 in3/d |
| 60 metric tsp/yr | 0.050123201 in3/d |
| 100 metric tsp/yr | 0.0835386683 in3/d |
| 1,000 metric tsp/yr | 0.8353866827 in3/d |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Days to Metric teaspoon per Years
0.0008353867 in3/d × 1197.050445 = 1.000000021 metric tsp/yr
0.0008353867 cubic inch per days = 1.000000021 metric teaspoon per years.
metric teaspoon per years = cubic inch per days × 1197.0504446
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Days to Metric teaspoon per Years.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Years (metric tsp/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Days (in3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inch per days are in 1 metric teaspoon per years?
1 metric teaspoon per years equals 0.0008353867 cubic inch per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per years to cubic inch per days?
Multiply the metric teaspoon per years value by 0.0008353866827. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per days back to metric teaspoon per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per days equals 1,197.050445 metric teaspoon per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric teaspoon per years?
Metric teaspoon per Years (metric tsp/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per days?
Cubic inch per Days (in3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the metric teaspoon per years to cubic inch per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric teaspoon per years and cubic inch per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0008353866827 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.