Volumetric flow rate.
Teaspoon per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks Converter — tsp/decade to cm3/wk
Convert Teaspoon per Decades (tsp/decade) to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 teaspoon per decades = 0.0094464503 cubic centimeter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Teaspoon per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.56191308e-14 / 1.65343915e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Teaspoon per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
Teaspoon per Decades and Cubic Centimeter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per weeks = teaspoon per decades × 0.0094464502779
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 teaspoon per decades equals 1.561913e-14 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct teaspoon per decades-to-cubic centimeter per weeks factor of 0.0094464502779.
Simple example
1 tsp/decade × 0.009446450278 = 0.0094464503 cm3/wk
1 teaspoon per decades = 0.0094464503 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 tsp/decade × 0.009446450278 = 0.5667870167 cm3/wk
60 teaspoon per decades = 0.5667870167 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Teaspoon per Decades (tsp/decade) | Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tsp/decade | 0.000944645 cm3/wk |
| 1 tsp/decade | 0.0094464503 cm3/wk |
| 10 tsp/decade | 0.0944645028 cm3/wk |
| 60 tsp/decade | 0.5667870167 cm3/wk |
| 100 tsp/decade | 0.9446450278 cm3/wk |
| 1,000 tsp/decade | 9.446450278 cm3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Decades
0.0094464503 cm3/wk × 105.8598702 = 1.000000002 tsp/decade
0.0094464503 cubic centimeter per weeks = 1.000000002 teaspoon per decades.
teaspoon per decades = cubic centimeter per weeks × 105.859870172
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Decades.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Decades (tsp/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per weeks are in 1 teaspoon per decades?
1 teaspoon per decades equals 0.0094464503 cubic centimeter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert teaspoon per decades to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Multiply the teaspoon per decades value by 0.009446450278. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks back to teaspoon per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 105.8598702 teaspoon per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a teaspoon per decades?
Teaspoon per Decades (tsp/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the teaspoon per decades to cubic centimeter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both teaspoon per decades and cubic centimeter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.009446450278 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.