Volumetric flow rate.
Teaspoon per Decades to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — tsp/decade to imp qt/wk
Convert Teaspoon per Decades (tsp/decade) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 teaspoon per decades = 0.0000083117 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Teaspoon per Decades to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.56191308e-14 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Teaspoon per Decades to Imperial quart per Weeks
Teaspoon per Decades and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = teaspoon per decades × 0.0000083117142669
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 teaspoon per decades equals 1.561913e-14 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct teaspoon per decades-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 0.0000083117142669.
Simple example
1 tsp/decade × 0.000008311714267 = 0.0000083117 imp qt/wk
1 teaspoon per decades = 0.0000083117 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 tsp/decade × 0.000008311714267 = 0.0004987029 imp qt/wk
60 teaspoon per decades = 0.0004987029 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Teaspoon per Decades (tsp/decade) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tsp/decade | 8.311714e-7 imp qt/wk |
| 1 tsp/decade | 0.0000083117 imp qt/wk |
| 10 tsp/decade | 0.0000831171 imp qt/wk |
| 60 tsp/decade | 0.0004987029 imp qt/wk |
| 100 tsp/decade | 0.0008311714 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 tsp/decade | 0.0083117143 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Teaspoon per Decades
0.0000083117 imp qt/wk × 120312.1243 = 0.9999982835 tsp/decade
0.0000083117 imperial quart per weeks = 0.9999982835 teaspoon per decades.
teaspoon per decades = imperial quart per weeks × 120312.124297
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Teaspoon per Decades.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Decades (tsp/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 teaspoon per decades?
1 teaspoon per decades equals 0.0000083117 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert teaspoon per decades to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the teaspoon per decades value by 0.000008311714267. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to teaspoon per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 120,312.1243 teaspoon per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a teaspoon per decades?
Teaspoon per Decades (tsp/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the teaspoon per decades to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both teaspoon per decades and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000008311714267 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.