Volumetric flow rate.
Teaspoons per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Hours Converter — tsp/fn to mm3/h
Convert Teaspoon per Fortnight (tsp/fn) to Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 teaspoon per fortnight = 14.66940951 cubic millimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Teaspoons per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.07483597e-12 / 2.77777778e-13.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Teaspoons per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Hours
Teaspoon per Fortnight and Cubic Millimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per hours = teaspoons per fortnight × 14.6694095052
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 teaspoon per fortnight equals 4.074836e-12 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-13 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct teaspoon per fortnight-to-cubic millimeter per hours factor of 14.6694095052.
Simple example
1 tsp/fn × 14.66940951 = 14.66940951 mm3/h
1 teaspoon per fortnight = 14.66940951 cubic millimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 tsp/fn × 14.66940951 = 880.1645703 mm3/h
60 teaspoons per fortnight = 880.1645703 cubic millimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Teaspoon per Fortnight (tsp/fn) | Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tsp/fn | 1.466940951 mm3/h |
| 1 tsp/fn | 14.66940951 mm3/h |
| 10 tsp/fn | 146.6940951 mm3/h |
| 60 tsp/fn | 880.1645703 mm3/h |
| 100 tsp/fn | 1,466.940951 mm3/h |
| 1,000 tsp/fn | 14,669.40951 mm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Teaspoon per Fortnight
14.66940951 mm3/h × 0.06816906977 = 1 tsp/fn
14.66940951 cubic millimeter per hours = 1 teaspoons per fortnight.
teaspoons per fortnight = cubic millimeter per hours × 0.0681690697669
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Teaspoon per Fortnight.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Fortnight (tsp/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per hours are in 1 teaspoon per fortnight?
1 teaspoon per fortnight equals 14.66940951 cubic millimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert teaspoon per fortnight to cubic millimeter per hours?
Multiply the teaspoon per fortnight value by 14.66940951. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per hours back to teaspoon per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 0.0681690698 teaspoons per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a teaspoon per fortnight?
Teaspoon per Fortnight (tsp/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per hours?
Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the teaspoon per fortnight to cubic millimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both teaspoon per fortnight and cubic millimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 14.66940951 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.