Volumetric flow rate.
Teaspoon per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight Converter — tsp/h to cm3/fn
Convert Teaspoon per Hours (tsp/h) to Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 teaspoon per hours = 1,656.117655 cubic centimeter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Teaspoon per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.36914489e-9 / 8.26719577e-13.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Teaspoon per Hours to Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight
Teaspoon per Hours and Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeters per fortnight = teaspoon per hours × 1656.1176555
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 teaspoon per hours equals 1.369145e-9 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct teaspoon per hours-to-cubic centimeter per fortnight factor of 1656.1176555.
Simple example
1 tsp/h × 1656.117655 = 1,656.117655 cm3/fn
1 teaspoon per hours = 1,656.117655 cubic centimeters per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 tsp/h × 1656.117655 = 99,367.05933 cm3/fn
60 teaspoon per hours = 99,367.05933 cubic centimeters per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Teaspoon per Hours (tsp/h) | Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tsp/h | 165.6117656 cm3/fn |
| 1 tsp/h | 1,656.117655 cm3/fn |
| 10 tsp/h | 16,561.17655 cm3/fn |
| 60 tsp/h | 99,367.05933 cm3/fn |
| 100 tsp/h | 165,611.7655 cm3/fn |
| 1,000 tsp/h | 1,656,117.655 cm3/fn |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight to Teaspoon per Hours
1 cm3/fn × 0.000603821834 = 0.0006038218 tsp/h
1 cubic centimeter per fortnight = 0.0006038218 teaspoon per hours.
teaspoon per hours = cubic centimeters per fortnight × 0.000603821833961
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight to Teaspoon per Hours.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Hours (tsp/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeters per fortnight are in 1 teaspoon per hours?
1 teaspoon per hours equals 1,656.117655 cubic centimeters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert teaspoon per hours to cubic centimeter per fortnight?
Multiply the teaspoon per hours value by 1656.117655. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per fortnight back to teaspoon per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per fortnight equals 0.0006038218 teaspoon per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a teaspoon per hours?
Teaspoon per Hours (tsp/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per fortnight?
Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the teaspoon per hours to cubic centimeter per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both teaspoon per hours and cubic centimeter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1656.117655 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.