Volumetric flow rate.
Teaspoons per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Hours Converter — tsp/ms to mm3/h
Convert Teaspoon per Millisecond (tsp/ms) to Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 teaspoon per millisecond = 17,744,117,740 cubic millimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Teaspoons per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.004928921594 / 2.77777778e-13.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Teaspoons per Millisecond to Cubic Millimeter per Hours
Teaspoon per Millisecond and Cubic Millimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per hours = teaspoons per millisecond × 17744117737.5
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 teaspoon per millisecond equals 0.00492892159375 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-13 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct teaspoon per millisecond-to-cubic millimeter per hours factor of 17744117737.5.
Simple example
1 tsp/ms × 17744117740 = 17,744,117,740 mm3/h
1 teaspoon per millisecond = 17,744,117,740 cubic millimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 tsp/ms × 17744117740 = 1.064647e+12 mm3/h
60 teaspoons per millisecond = 1.064647e+12 cubic millimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Teaspoon per Millisecond (tsp/ms) | Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tsp/ms | 1,774,411,774 mm3/h |
| 1 tsp/ms | 17,744,117,740 mm3/h |
| 10 tsp/ms | 177,441,177,400 mm3/h |
| 60 tsp/ms | 1.064647e+12 mm3/h |
| 100 tsp/ms | 1.774412e+12 mm3/h |
| 1,000 tsp/ms | 1.774412e+13 mm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Teaspoon per Millisecond
1 mm3/h × 5.63567e-11 = 5.63567e-11 tsp/ms
1 cubic millimeter per hours = 5.63567e-11 teaspoons per millisecond.
teaspoons per millisecond = cubic millimeter per hours × 5.63567e-11
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Teaspoon per Millisecond.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Millisecond (tsp/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per hours are in 1 teaspoon per millisecond?
1 teaspoon per millisecond equals 17,744,117,740 cubic millimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert teaspoon per millisecond to cubic millimeter per hours?
Multiply the teaspoon per millisecond value by 17744117740. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per hours back to teaspoon per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 5.63567e-11 teaspoons per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a teaspoon per millisecond?
Teaspoon per Millisecond (tsp/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per hours?
Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the teaspoon per millisecond to cubic millimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both teaspoon per millisecond and cubic millimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 17744117740 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.