Volumetric flow rate.
Teaspoon per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks Converter — tsp/min to mm3/wk
Convert Teaspoon per Minutes (tsp/min) to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 teaspoon per minutes = 49,683,529.66 cubic millimeter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Teaspoon per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.21486932e-8 / 1.65343915e-15.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Teaspoon per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks
Teaspoon per Minutes and Cubic Millimeter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per weeks = teaspoon per minutes × 49683529.665
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 teaspoon per minutes equals 8.214869e-8 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-15 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct teaspoon per minutes-to-cubic millimeter per weeks factor of 49683529.665.
Simple example
1 tsp/min × 49683529.66 = 49,683,529.66 mm3/wk
1 teaspoon per minutes = 49,683,529.66 cubic millimeter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 tsp/min × 49683529.66 = 2,981,011,780 mm3/wk
60 teaspoon per minutes = 2,981,011,780 cubic millimeter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Teaspoon per Minutes (tsp/min) | Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tsp/min | 4,968,352.966 mm3/wk |
| 1 tsp/min | 49,683,529.66 mm3/wk |
| 10 tsp/min | 496,835,296.6 mm3/wk |
| 60 tsp/min | 2,981,011,780 mm3/wk |
| 100 tsp/min | 4,968,352,966 mm3/wk |
| 1,000 tsp/min | 49,683,529,660 mm3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Minutes
1 mm3/wk × 2.012739e-8 = 2.012739e-8 tsp/min
1 cubic millimeter per weeks = 2.012739e-8 teaspoon per minutes.
teaspoon per minutes = cubic millimeter per weeks × 2.012739e-8
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Minutes.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Minutes (tsp/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per weeks are in 1 teaspoon per minutes?
1 teaspoon per minutes equals 49,683,529.66 cubic millimeter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert teaspoon per minutes to cubic millimeter per weeks?
Multiply the teaspoon per minutes value by 49683529.66. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per weeks back to teaspoon per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 2.012739e-8 teaspoon per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a teaspoon per minutes?
Teaspoon per Minutes (tsp/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per weeks?
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the teaspoon per minutes to cubic millimeter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both teaspoon per minutes and cubic millimeter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 49683529.66 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.