Volumetric flow rate.
Teaspoon per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Days Converter — tsp/s to mm3/d
Convert Teaspoon per Seconds (tsp/s) to Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 teaspoon per seconds = 425,858,825.7 cubic millimeter per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Teaspoon per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.92892159e-6 / 1.15740741e-14.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Teaspoon per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Days
Teaspoon per Seconds and Cubic Millimeter per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per days = teaspoon per seconds × 425858825.7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 teaspoon per seconds equals 0.00000492892159375 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per days equals 1.157407e-14 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct teaspoon per seconds-to-cubic millimeter per days factor of 425858825.7.
Simple example
1 tsp/s × 425858825.7 = 425,858,825.7 mm3/d
1 teaspoon per seconds = 425,858,825.7 cubic millimeter per days.
Real-world example
60 tsp/s × 425858825.7 = 25,551,529,540 mm3/d
60 teaspoon per seconds = 25,551,529,540 cubic millimeter per days.
Conversion table
| Teaspoon per Seconds (tsp/s) | Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tsp/s | 42,585,882.57 mm3/d |
| 1 tsp/s | 425,858,825.7 mm3/d |
| 10 tsp/s | 4,258,588,257 mm3/d |
| 60 tsp/s | 25,551,529,540 mm3/d |
| 100 tsp/s | 42,585,882,570 mm3/d |
| 1,000 tsp/s | 425,858,825,700 mm3/d |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Days to Teaspoon per Seconds
1 mm3/d × 2.348196e-9 = 2.348196e-9 tsp/s
1 cubic millimeter per days = 2.348196e-9 teaspoon per seconds.
teaspoon per seconds = cubic millimeter per days × 2.348196e-9
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Days to Teaspoon per Seconds.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Seconds (tsp/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per days are in 1 teaspoon per seconds?
1 teaspoon per seconds equals 425,858,825.7 cubic millimeter per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert teaspoon per seconds to cubic millimeter per days?
Multiply the teaspoon per seconds value by 425858825.7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per days back to teaspoon per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per days equals 2.348196e-9 teaspoon per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a teaspoon per seconds?
Teaspoon per Seconds (tsp/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per days?
Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the teaspoon per seconds to cubic millimeter per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both teaspoon per seconds and cubic millimeter per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 425858825.7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.