Volumetric flow rate.
Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours Converter — tsp/wk to cm3/h
Convert Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 teaspoon per weeks = 0.029338819 cubic centimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.14967195e-12 / 2.77777778e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
Teaspoon per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per hours = teaspoon per weeks × 0.0293388190104
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 8.149672e-12 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct teaspoon per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per hours factor of 0.0293388190104.
Simple example
1 tsp/wk × 0.02933881901 = 0.029338819 cm3/h
1 teaspoon per weeks = 0.029338819 cubic centimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 tsp/wk × 0.02933881901 = 1.760329141 cm3/h
60 teaspoon per weeks = 1.760329141 cubic centimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tsp/wk | 0.0029338819 cm3/h |
| 1 tsp/wk | 0.029338819 cm3/h |
| 10 tsp/wk | 0.2933881901 cm3/h |
| 60 tsp/wk | 1.760329141 cm3/h |
| 100 tsp/wk | 2.933881901 cm3/h |
| 1,000 tsp/wk | 29.33881901 cm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Teaspoon per Weeks
0.029338819 cm3/h × 34.08453488 = 0.9999999996 tsp/wk
0.029338819 cubic centimeter per hours = 0.9999999996 teaspoon per weeks.
teaspoon per weeks = cubic centimeter per hours × 34.0845348835
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Teaspoon per Weeks.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per hours are in 1 teaspoon per weeks?
1 teaspoon per weeks equals 0.029338819 cubic centimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert teaspoon per weeks to cubic centimeter per hours?
Multiply the teaspoon per weeks value by 0.02933881901. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours back to teaspoon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 34.08453488 teaspoon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a teaspoon per weeks?
Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the teaspoon per weeks to cubic centimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both teaspoon per weeks and cubic centimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.02933881901 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.