Volumetric flow rate.
Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Meters per Millisecond Converter — tsp/wk to m3/ms
Convert Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) to Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 teaspoon per weeks = 8.149672e-15 cubic meter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Meters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.14967195e-12 / 1000.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Meters per Millisecond
Teaspoon per Weeks and Cubic Meter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meters per millisecond = teaspoon per weeks × 8.149672e-15
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 8.149672e-12 base units, and 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 1000 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct teaspoon per weeks-to-cubic meter per millisecond factor of 8.149672e-15.
Simple example
1 tsp/wk × 8.149672e-15 = 8.149672e-15 m3/ms
1 teaspoon per weeks = 8.149672e-15 cubic meters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 tsp/wk × 8.149672e-15 = 4.889803e-13 m3/ms
60 teaspoon per weeks = 4.889803e-13 cubic meters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) | Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tsp/wk | 8.149672e-16 m3/ms |
| 1 tsp/wk | 8.149672e-15 m3/ms |
| 10 tsp/wk | 8.149672e-14 m3/ms |
| 60 tsp/wk | 4.889803e-13 m3/ms |
| 100 tsp/wk | 8.149672e-13 m3/ms |
| 1,000 tsp/wk | 8.149672e-12 m3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Teaspoon per Weeks
8.149672e-15 m3/ms × 1.227043e+14 = 1.000000006 tsp/wk
8.149672e-15 cubic meters per millisecond = 1.000000006 teaspoon per weeks.
teaspoon per weeks = cubic meters per millisecond × 1.227043e+14
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Teaspoon per Weeks.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meters per millisecond are in 1 teaspoon per weeks?
1 teaspoon per weeks equals 8.149672e-15 cubic meters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert teaspoon per weeks to cubic meter per millisecond?
Multiply the teaspoon per weeks value by 8.149672e-15. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per millisecond back to teaspoon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 1.227043e+14 teaspoon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a teaspoon per weeks?
Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per millisecond?
Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the teaspoon per weeks to cubic meter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both teaspoon per weeks and cubic meter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 8.149672e-15 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.