Volumetric flow rate.
Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Days Converter — tsp/wk to mm3/d
Convert Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 teaspoon per weeks = 704.1316562 cubic millimeter per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.14967195e-12 / 1.15740741e-14.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Days
Teaspoon per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per days = teaspoon per weeks × 704.13165625
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 8.149672e-12 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per days equals 1.157407e-14 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct teaspoon per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per days factor of 704.13165625.
Simple example
1 tsp/wk × 704.1316562 = 704.1316562 mm3/d
1 teaspoon per weeks = 704.1316562 cubic millimeter per days.
Real-world example
60 tsp/wk × 704.1316562 = 42,247.89937 mm3/d
60 teaspoon per weeks = 42,247.89937 cubic millimeter per days.
Conversion table
| Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tsp/wk | 70.41316562 mm3/d |
| 1 tsp/wk | 704.1316562 mm3/d |
| 10 tsp/wk | 7,041.316562 mm3/d |
| 60 tsp/wk | 42,247.89937 mm3/d |
| 100 tsp/wk | 70,413.16562 mm3/d |
| 1,000 tsp/wk | 704,131.6562 mm3/d |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Days to Teaspoon per Weeks
704.1316562 mm3/d × 0.001420188953 = 0.9999999999 tsp/wk
704.1316562 cubic millimeter per days = 0.9999999999 teaspoon per weeks.
teaspoon per weeks = cubic millimeter per days × 0.00142018895348
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Days to Teaspoon per Weeks.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per days are in 1 teaspoon per weeks?
1 teaspoon per weeks equals 704.1316562 cubic millimeter per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert teaspoon per weeks to cubic millimeter per days?
Multiply the teaspoon per weeks value by 704.1316562. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per days back to teaspoon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per days equals 0.001420189 teaspoon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a teaspoon per weeks?
Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per days?
Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the teaspoon per weeks to cubic millimeter per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both teaspoon per weeks and cubic millimeter per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 704.1316562 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.