Volumetric flow rate.
Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Hours Converter — tsp/wk to mm3/h
Convert Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 teaspoon per weeks = 29.33881901 cubic millimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.14967195e-12 / 2.77777778e-13.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Hours
Teaspoon per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per hours = teaspoon per weeks × 29.3388190104
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 8.149672e-12 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-13 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct teaspoon per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per hours factor of 29.3388190104.
Simple example
1 tsp/wk × 29.33881901 = 29.33881901 mm3/h
1 teaspoon per weeks = 29.33881901 cubic millimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 tsp/wk × 29.33881901 = 1,760.329141 mm3/h
60 teaspoon per weeks = 1,760.329141 cubic millimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tsp/wk | 2.933881901 mm3/h |
| 1 tsp/wk | 29.33881901 mm3/h |
| 10 tsp/wk | 293.3881901 mm3/h |
| 60 tsp/wk | 1,760.329141 mm3/h |
| 100 tsp/wk | 2,933.881901 mm3/h |
| 1,000 tsp/wk | 29,338.81901 mm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Teaspoon per Weeks
29.33881901 mm3/h × 0.03408453488 = 1 tsp/wk
29.33881901 cubic millimeter per hours = 1 teaspoon per weeks.
teaspoon per weeks = cubic millimeter per hours × 0.0340845348835
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Teaspoon per Weeks.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per hours are in 1 teaspoon per weeks?
1 teaspoon per weeks equals 29.33881901 cubic millimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert teaspoon per weeks to cubic millimeter per hours?
Multiply the teaspoon per weeks value by 29.33881901. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per hours back to teaspoon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 0.0340845349 teaspoon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a teaspoon per weeks?
Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per hours?
Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the teaspoon per weeks to cubic millimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both teaspoon per weeks and cubic millimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 29.33881901 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.