Volumetric flow rate.
Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes Converter — tsp/wk to mm3/min
Convert Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 teaspoon per weeks = 0.4889803168 cubic millimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.14967195e-12 / 1.66666667e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
Teaspoon per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per minutes = teaspoon per weeks × 0.48898031684
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 8.149672e-12 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct teaspoon per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per minutes factor of 0.48898031684.
Simple example
1 tsp/wk × 0.4889803168 = 0.4889803168 mm3/min
1 teaspoon per weeks = 0.4889803168 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 tsp/wk × 0.4889803168 = 29.33881901 mm3/min
60 teaspoon per weeks = 29.33881901 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tsp/wk | 0.0488980317 mm3/min |
| 1 tsp/wk | 0.4889803168 mm3/min |
| 10 tsp/wk | 4.889803168 mm3/min |
| 60 tsp/wk | 29.33881901 mm3/min |
| 100 tsp/wk | 48.89803168 mm3/min |
| 1,000 tsp/wk | 488.9803168 mm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Teaspoon per Weeks
0.4889803168 mm3/min × 2.045072093 = 0.9999999999 tsp/wk
0.4889803168 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.9999999999 teaspoon per weeks.
teaspoon per weeks = cubic millimeter per minutes × 2.04507209301
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Teaspoon per Weeks.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per minutes are in 1 teaspoon per weeks?
1 teaspoon per weeks equals 0.4889803168 cubic millimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert teaspoon per weeks to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Multiply the teaspoon per weeks value by 0.4889803168. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes back to teaspoon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 2.045072093 teaspoon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a teaspoon per weeks?
Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the teaspoon per weeks to cubic millimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both teaspoon per weeks and cubic millimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.4889803168 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.