Volumetric flow rate.
Teaspoon per Weeks to Microliters per Millisecond Converter — tsp/wk to uL/ms
Convert Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) to Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 teaspoon per weeks = 0.0000081497 microliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Teaspoon per Weeks to Microliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.14967195e-12 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Teaspoon per Weeks to Microliters per Millisecond
Teaspoon per Weeks and Microliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
microliters per millisecond = teaspoon per weeks × 0.00000814967194734
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 8.149672e-12 base units, and 1 microliter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct teaspoon per weeks-to-microliter per millisecond factor of 0.00000814967194734.
Simple example
1 tsp/wk × 0.000008149671947 = 0.0000081497 uL/ms
1 teaspoon per weeks = 0.0000081497 microliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 tsp/wk × 0.000008149671947 = 0.0004889803 uL/ms
60 teaspoon per weeks = 0.0004889803 microliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) | Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 tsp/wk | 8.149672e-7 uL/ms |
| 1 tsp/wk | 0.0000081497 uL/ms |
| 10 tsp/wk | 0.0000814967 uL/ms |
| 60 tsp/wk | 0.0004889803 uL/ms |
| 100 tsp/wk | 0.0008149672 uL/ms |
| 1,000 tsp/wk | 0.0081496719 uL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Microliter per Millisecond to Teaspoon per Weeks
0.0000081497 uL/ms × 122704.3256 = 1.000003442 tsp/wk
0.0000081497 microliters per millisecond = 1.000003442 teaspoon per weeks.
teaspoon per weeks = microliters per millisecond × 122704.32558
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Microliter per Millisecond to Teaspoon per Weeks.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many microliters per millisecond are in 1 teaspoon per weeks?
1 teaspoon per weeks equals 0.0000081497 microliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert teaspoon per weeks to microliter per millisecond?
Multiply the teaspoon per weeks value by 0.000008149671947. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert microliter per millisecond back to teaspoon per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 microliter per millisecond equals 122,704.3256 teaspoon per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a teaspoon per weeks?
Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a microliter per millisecond?
Microliter per Millisecond (uL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the teaspoon per weeks to microliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both teaspoon per weeks and microliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000008149671947 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.