Volumetric flow rate.
Oil barrel per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — bbl/h to imp qt/wk
Convert Oil barrel per Hours (bbl/h) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 oil barrel per hours = 23,501.39619 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Oil barrel per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.41631375e-5 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Oil barrel per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks
Oil barrel per Hours and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = oil barrel per hours × 23501.396187
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 oil barrel per hours equals 0.00004416313748 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct oil barrel per hours-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 23501.396187.
Simple example
1 bbl/h × 23501.39619 = 23,501.39619 imp qt/wk
1 oil barrel per hours = 23,501.39619 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 bbl/h × 23501.39619 = 1,410,083.771 imp qt/wk
60 oil barrel per hours = 1,410,083.771 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Oil barrel per Hours (bbl/h) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bbl/h | 2,350.139619 imp qt/wk |
| 1 bbl/h | 23,501.39619 imp qt/wk |
| 10 bbl/h | 235,013.9619 imp qt/wk |
| 60 bbl/h | 1,410,083.771 imp qt/wk |
| 100 bbl/h | 2,350,139.619 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 bbl/h | 23,501,396.19 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Oil barrel per Hours
1 imp qt/wk × 0.00004255066346 = 0.0000425507 bbl/h
1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0000425507 oil barrel per hours.
oil barrel per hours = imperial quart per weeks × 0.0000425506634603
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Oil barrel per Hours.
Understanding the Oil barrel per Hours (bbl/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 oil barrel per hours?
1 oil barrel per hours equals 23,501.39619 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert oil barrel per hours to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the oil barrel per hours value by 23501.39619. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to oil barrel per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.0000425507 oil barrel per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a oil barrel per hours?
Oil barrel per Hours (bbl/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the oil barrel per hours to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both oil barrel per hours and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 23501.39619 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.