Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Oil barrel per Hours Converter — imp qt/wk to bbl/h
Convert Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) to Oil barrel per Hours (bbl/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0000425507 oil barrel per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Oil barrel per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.8791708e-9 / 4.41631375e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Weeks to Oil barrel per Hours
Imperial quart per Weeks and Oil barrel per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
oil barrel per hours = imperial quart per weeks × 0.0000425506634603
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, and 1 oil barrel per hours equals 0.00004416313748 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per weeks-to-oil barrel per hours factor of 0.0000425506634603.
Simple example
1 imp qt/wk × 0.00004255066346 = 0.0000425507 bbl/h
1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0000425507 oil barrel per hours.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/wk × 0.00004255066346 = 0.0025530398 bbl/h
60 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0025530398 oil barrel per hours.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) | Oil barrel per Hours (bbl/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/wk | 0.0000042551 bbl/h |
| 1 imp qt/wk | 0.0000425507 bbl/h |
| 10 imp qt/wk | 0.0004255066 bbl/h |
| 60 imp qt/wk | 0.0025530398 bbl/h |
| 100 imp qt/wk | 0.0042550663 bbl/h |
| 1,000 imp qt/wk | 0.0425506635 bbl/h |
Reverse conversion: Oil barrel per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks
0.0000425507 bbl/h × 23501.39619 = 1.000000859 imp qt/wk
0.0000425507 oil barrel per hours = 1.000000859 imperial quart per weeks.
imperial quart per weeks = oil barrel per hours × 23501.396187
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Oil barrel per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Oil barrel per Hours (bbl/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many oil barrel per hours are in 1 imperial quart per weeks?
1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.0000425507 oil barrel per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks to oil barrel per hours?
Multiply the imperial quart per weeks value by 0.00004255066346. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert oil barrel per hours back to imperial quart per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 oil barrel per hours equals 23,501.39619 imperial quart per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a oil barrel per hours?
Oil barrel per Hours (bbl/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per weeks to oil barrel per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per weeks and oil barrel per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00004255066346 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.