Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes Converter — bu/h to mm3/min
Convert Bushel per Hours (bu/h) to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per hours = 587,317.8361 cubic millimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 9.7886306e-6 / 1.66666667e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
Bushel per Hours and Cubic Millimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per minutes = bushel per hours × 587317.836115
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per hours equals 0.00000978863060191 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per hours-to-cubic millimeter per minutes factor of 587317.836115.
Simple example
1 bu/h × 587317.8361 = 587,317.8361 mm3/min
1 bushel per hours = 587,317.8361 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 bu/h × 587317.8361 = 35,239,070.17 mm3/min
60 bushel per hours = 35,239,070.17 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Hours (bu/h) | Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/h | 58,731.78361 mm3/min |
| 1 bu/h | 587,317.8361 mm3/min |
| 10 bu/h | 5,873,178.361 mm3/min |
| 60 bu/h | 35,239,070.17 mm3/min |
| 100 bu/h | 58,731,783.61 mm3/min |
| 1,000 bu/h | 587,317,836.1 mm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Bushel per Hours
1 mm3/min × 0.000001702655596 = 0.0000017027 bu/h
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0000017027 bushel per hours.
bushel per hours = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.0000017026555955
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Bushel per Hours.
Understanding the Bushel per Hours (bu/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per minutes are in 1 bushel per hours?
1 bushel per hours equals 587,317.8361 cubic millimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per hours to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Multiply the bushel per hours value by 587317.8361. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes back to bushel per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.0000017027 bushel per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per hours?
Bushel per Hours (bu/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per hours to cubic millimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per hours and cubic millimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 587317.8361 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.