Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Bushel per Hours Converter — mm3/min to bu/h
Convert Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) to Bushel per Hours (bu/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0000017027 bushel per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Bushel per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-11 / 9.7886306e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Bushel per Hours
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes and Bushel per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per hours = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.0000017026555955
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, and 1 bushel per hours equals 0.00000978863060191 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic millimeter per minutes-to-bushel per hours factor of 0.0000017026555955.
Simple example
1 mm3/min × 0.000001702655596 = 0.0000017027 bu/h
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0000017027 bushel per hours.
Real-world example
60 mm3/min × 0.000001702655596 = 0.0001021593 bu/h
60 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0001021593 bushel per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) | Bushel per Hours (bu/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mm3/min | 1.702656e-7 bu/h |
| 1 mm3/min | 0.0000017027 bu/h |
| 10 mm3/min | 0.0000170266 bu/h |
| 60 mm3/min | 0.0001021593 bu/h |
| 100 mm3/min | 0.0001702656 bu/h |
| 1,000 mm3/min | 0.0017026556 bu/h |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
0.0000017027 bu/h × 587317.8361 = 1.00002608 mm3/min
0.0000017027 bushel per hours = 1.00002608 cubic millimeter per minutes.
cubic millimeter per minutes = bushel per hours × 587317.836115
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Hours (bu/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per hours are in 1 cubic millimeter per minutes?
1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.0000017027 bushel per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes to bushel per hours?
Multiply the cubic millimeter per minutes value by 0.000001702655596. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per hours back to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per hours equals 587,317.8361 cubic millimeter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per hours?
Bushel per Hours (bu/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic millimeter per minutes to bushel per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic millimeter per minutes and bushel per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000001702655596 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.