Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Hours to Imperial quarts per Millisecond Converter — bu/h to imp qt/ms
Convert Bushel per Hours (bu/h) to Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per hours = 0.0000086128 imperial quart per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Hours to Imperial quarts per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 9.7886306e-6 / 1.1365225.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Hours to Imperial quarts per Millisecond
Bushel per Hours and Imperial quart per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quarts per millisecond = bushel per hours × 0.00000861279086152
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per hours equals 0.00000978863060191 base units, and 1 imperial quart per millisecond equals 1.1365225 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per hours-to-imperial quart per millisecond factor of 0.00000861279086152.
Simple example
1 bu/h × 0.000008612790862 = 0.0000086128 imp qt/ms
1 bushel per hours = 0.0000086128 imperial quarts per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/h × 0.000008612790862 = 0.0005167675 imp qt/ms
60 bushel per hours = 0.0005167675 imperial quarts per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Hours (bu/h) | Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/h | 8.612791e-7 imp qt/ms |
| 1 bu/h | 0.0000086128 imp qt/ms |
| 10 bu/h | 0.0000861279 imp qt/ms |
| 60 bu/h | 0.0005167675 imp qt/ms |
| 100 bu/h | 0.0008612791 imp qt/ms |
| 1,000 bu/h | 0.0086127909 imp qt/ms |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Millisecond to Bushel per Hours
0.0000086128 imp qt/ms × 116106.3836 = 1.000001061 bu/h
0.0000086128 imperial quarts per millisecond = 1.000001061 bushel per hours.
bushel per hours = imperial quarts per millisecond × 116106.383642
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Millisecond to Bushel per Hours.
Understanding the Bushel per Hours (bu/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quarts per millisecond are in 1 bushel per hours?
1 bushel per hours equals 0.0000086128 imperial quarts per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per hours to imperial quart per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per hours value by 0.000008612790862. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per millisecond back to bushel per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per millisecond equals 116,106.3836 bushel per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per hours?
Bushel per Hours (bu/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per millisecond?
Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per hours to imperial quart per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per hours and imperial quart per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000008612790862 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.