Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quarts per Millisecond to Bushel per Hours Converter — imp qt/ms to bu/h
Convert Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) to Bushel per Hours (bu/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per millisecond = 116,106.3836 bushel per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quarts per Millisecond to Bushel per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.1365225 / 9.7886306e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quarts per Millisecond to Bushel per Hours
Imperial quart per Millisecond and Bushel per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per hours = imperial quarts per millisecond × 116106.383642
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per millisecond equals 1.1365225 base units, and 1 bushel per hours equals 0.00000978863060191 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per millisecond-to-bushel per hours factor of 116106.383642.
Simple example
1 imp qt/ms × 116106.3836 = 116,106.3836 bu/h
1 imperial quart per millisecond = 116,106.3836 bushel per hours.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/ms × 116106.3836 = 6,966,383.019 bu/h
60 imperial quarts per millisecond = 6,966,383.019 bushel per hours.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) | Bushel per Hours (bu/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/ms | 11,610.63836 bu/h |
| 1 imp qt/ms | 116,106.3836 bu/h |
| 10 imp qt/ms | 1,161,063.836 bu/h |
| 60 imp qt/ms | 6,966,383.019 bu/h |
| 100 imp qt/ms | 11,610,638.36 bu/h |
| 1,000 imp qt/ms | 116,106,383.6 bu/h |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Hours to Imperial quart per Millisecond
1 bu/h × 0.000008612790862 = 0.0000086128 imp qt/ms
1 bushel per hours = 0.0000086128 imperial quarts per millisecond.
imperial quarts per millisecond = bushel per hours × 0.00000861279086152
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Hours to Imperial quart per Millisecond.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Hours (bu/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per hours are in 1 imperial quart per millisecond?
1 imperial quart per millisecond equals 116,106.3836 bushel per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per millisecond to bushel per hours?
Multiply the imperial quart per millisecond value by 116106.3836. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per hours back to imperial quart per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per hours equals 0.0000086128 imperial quarts per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per millisecond?
Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per hours?
Bushel per Hours (bu/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per millisecond to bushel per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per millisecond and bushel per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 116106.3836 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.