Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Minutes to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — bu/min to ft3/ms
Convert Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per minutes = 0.0000207409 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Minutes to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0005873178361 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Minutes to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Bushel per Minutes and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = bushel per minutes × 0.000020740933642
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.000587317836115 base units, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per minutes-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 0.000020740933642.
Simple example
1 bu/min × 0.00002074093364 = 0.0000207409 ft3/ms
1 bushel per minutes = 0.0000207409 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/min × 0.00002074093364 = 0.001244456 ft3/ms
60 bushel per minutes = 0.001244456 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/min | 0.0000020741 ft3/ms |
| 1 bu/min | 0.0000207409 ft3/ms |
| 10 bu/min | 0.0002074093 ft3/ms |
| 60 bu/min | 0.001244456 ft3/ms |
| 100 bu/min | 0.0020740934 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 bu/min | 0.0207409336 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes
0.0000207409 ft3/ms × 48213.8373 = 0.999998378 bu/min
0.0000207409 cubic feet per millisecond = 0.999998378 bushel per minutes.
bushel per minutes = cubic feet per millisecond × 48213.8372969
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes.
Understanding the Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 bushel per minutes?
1 bushel per minutes equals 0.0000207409 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per minutes to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per minutes value by 0.00002074093364. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to bushel per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 48,213.8373 bushel per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per minutes?
Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per minutes to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per minutes and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00002074093364 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.