Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes Converter — ft3/ms to bu/min
Convert Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) to Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per millisecond = 48,213.8373 bushel per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 28.31684659 / 0.0005873178361.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic feet per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes
Cubic foot per Millisecond and Bushel per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per minutes = cubic feet per millisecond × 48213.8372969
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, and 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.000587317836115 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per millisecond-to-bushel per minutes factor of 48213.8372969.
Simple example
1 ft3/ms × 48213.8373 = 48,213.8373 bu/min
1 cubic foot per millisecond = 48,213.8373 bushel per minutes.
Real-world example
60 ft3/ms × 48213.8373 = 2,892,830.238 bu/min
60 cubic feet per millisecond = 2,892,830.238 bushel per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) | Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/ms | 4,821.38373 bu/min |
| 1 ft3/ms | 48,213.8373 bu/min |
| 10 ft3/ms | 482,138.373 bu/min |
| 60 ft3/ms | 2,892,830.238 bu/min |
| 100 ft3/ms | 4,821,383.73 bu/min |
| 1,000 ft3/ms | 48,213,837.3 bu/min |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Minutes to Cubic foot per Millisecond
1 bu/min × 0.00002074093364 = 0.0000207409 ft3/ms
1 bushel per minutes = 0.0000207409 cubic feet per millisecond.
cubic feet per millisecond = bushel per minutes × 0.000020740933642
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Minutes to Cubic foot per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per minutes are in 1 cubic foot per millisecond?
1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 48,213.8373 bushel per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond to bushel per minutes?
Multiply the cubic foot per millisecond value by 48213.8373. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per minutes back to cubic foot per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.0000207409 cubic feet per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per minutes?
Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per millisecond to bushel per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per millisecond and bushel per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 48213.8373 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.