Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Minutes to Hectoliters per Millisecond Converter — bu/min to hL/ms
Convert Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) to Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per minutes = 0.0000058732 hectoliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Minutes to Hectoliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0005873178361 / 100.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Minutes to Hectoliters per Millisecond
Bushel per Minutes and Hectoliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
hectoliters per millisecond = bushel per minutes × 0.00000587317836115
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.000587317836115 base units, and 1 hectoliter per millisecond equals 100 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per minutes-to-hectoliter per millisecond factor of 0.00000587317836115.
Simple example
1 bu/min × 0.000005873178361 = 0.0000058732 hL/ms
1 bushel per minutes = 0.0000058732 hectoliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/min × 0.000005873178361 = 0.0003523907 hL/ms
60 bushel per minutes = 0.0003523907 hectoliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) | Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/min | 5.873178e-7 hL/ms |
| 1 bu/min | 0.0000058732 hL/ms |
| 10 bu/min | 0.0000587318 hL/ms |
| 60 bu/min | 0.0003523907 hL/ms |
| 100 bu/min | 0.0005873178 hL/ms |
| 1,000 bu/min | 0.0058731784 hL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Hectoliter per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes
0.0000058732 hL/ms × 170265.5596 = 1.000003684 bu/min
0.0000058732 hectoliters per millisecond = 1.000003684 bushel per minutes.
bushel per minutes = hectoliters per millisecond × 170265.55955
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Hectoliter per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes.
Understanding the Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many hectoliters per millisecond are in 1 bushel per minutes?
1 bushel per minutes equals 0.0000058732 hectoliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per minutes to hectoliter per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per minutes value by 0.000005873178361. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert hectoliter per millisecond back to bushel per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 hectoliter per millisecond equals 170,265.5596 bushel per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per minutes?
Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a hectoliter per millisecond?
Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per minutes to hectoliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per minutes and hectoliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000005873178361 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.