Volumetric flow rate.
Hectoliters per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes Converter — hL/ms to bu/min
Convert Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) to Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 hectoliter per millisecond = 170,265.5596 bushel per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Hectoliters per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 100 / 0.0005873178361.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Hectoliters per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes
Hectoliter per Millisecond and Bushel per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per minutes = hectoliters per millisecond × 170265.55955
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 hectoliter per millisecond equals 100 base units, and 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.000587317836115 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct hectoliter per millisecond-to-bushel per minutes factor of 170265.55955.
Simple example
1 hL/ms × 170265.5596 = 170,265.5596 bu/min
1 hectoliter per millisecond = 170,265.5596 bushel per minutes.
Real-world example
60 hL/ms × 170265.5596 = 10,215,933.57 bu/min
60 hectoliters per millisecond = 10,215,933.57 bushel per minutes.
Conversion table
| Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) | Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 hL/ms | 17,026.55596 bu/min |
| 1 hL/ms | 170,265.5596 bu/min |
| 10 hL/ms | 1,702,655.596 bu/min |
| 60 hL/ms | 10,215,933.57 bu/min |
| 100 hL/ms | 17,026,555.96 bu/min |
| 1,000 hL/ms | 170,265,559.6 bu/min |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Minutes to Hectoliter per Millisecond
1 bu/min × 0.000005873178361 = 0.0000058732 hL/ms
1 bushel per minutes = 0.0000058732 hectoliters per millisecond.
hectoliters per millisecond = bushel per minutes × 0.00000587317836115
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Minutes to Hectoliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per minutes are in 1 hectoliter per millisecond?
1 hectoliter per millisecond equals 170,265.5596 bushel per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert hectoliter per millisecond to bushel per minutes?
Multiply the hectoliter per millisecond value by 170265.5596. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per minutes back to hectoliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.0000058732 hectoliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a hectoliter per millisecond?
Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per minutes?
Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the hectoliter per millisecond to bushel per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both hectoliter per millisecond and bushel per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 170265.5596 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.