Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — bu/min to imp qt/wk
Convert Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per minutes = 312,540.9548 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0005873178361 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks
Bushel per Minutes and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = bushel per minutes × 312540.954783
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.000587317836115 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per minutes-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 312540.954783.
Simple example
1 bu/min × 312540.9548 = 312,540.9548 imp qt/wk
1 bushel per minutes = 312,540.9548 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 bu/min × 312540.9548 = 18,752,457.29 imp qt/wk
60 bushel per minutes = 18,752,457.29 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/min | 31,254.09548 imp qt/wk |
| 1 bu/min | 312,540.9548 imp qt/wk |
| 10 bu/min | 3,125,409.548 imp qt/wk |
| 60 bu/min | 18,752,457.29 imp qt/wk |
| 100 bu/min | 31,254,095.48 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 bu/min | 312,540,954.8 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Bushel per Minutes
1 imp qt/wk × 0.000003199580678 = 0.0000031996 bu/min
1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0000031996 bushel per minutes.
bushel per minutes = imperial quart per weeks × 0.00000319958067798
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Bushel per Minutes.
Understanding the Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 bushel per minutes?
1 bushel per minutes equals 312,540.9548 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per minutes to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the bushel per minutes value by 312540.9548. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to bushel per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.0000031996 bushel per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per minutes?
Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per minutes to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per minutes and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 312540.9548 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.