Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Bushel per Minutes Converter — imp qt/wk to bu/min
Convert Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) to Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0000031996 bushel per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Weeks to Bushel per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.8791708e-9 / 0.0005873178361.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Weeks to Bushel per Minutes
Imperial quart per Weeks and Bushel per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per minutes = imperial quart per weeks × 0.00000319958067798
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, and 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.000587317836115 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per weeks-to-bushel per minutes factor of 0.00000319958067798.
Simple example
1 imp qt/wk × 0.000003199580678 = 0.0000031996 bu/min
1 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0000031996 bushel per minutes.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/wk × 0.000003199580678 = 0.0001919748 bu/min
60 imperial quart per weeks = 0.0001919748 bushel per minutes.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) | Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/wk | 3.199581e-7 bu/min |
| 1 imp qt/wk | 0.0000031996 bu/min |
| 10 imp qt/wk | 0.0000319958 bu/min |
| 60 imp qt/wk | 0.0001919748 bu/min |
| 100 imp qt/wk | 0.0003199581 bu/min |
| 1,000 imp qt/wk | 0.0031995807 bu/min |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks
0.0000031996 bu/min × 312540.9548 = 1.000006039 imp qt/wk
0.0000031996 bushel per minutes = 1.000006039 imperial quart per weeks.
imperial quart per weeks = bushel per minutes × 312540.954783
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per minutes are in 1 imperial quart per weeks?
1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.0000031996 bushel per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks to bushel per minutes?
Multiply the imperial quart per weeks value by 0.000003199580678. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per minutes back to imperial quart per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per minutes equals 312,540.9548 imperial quart per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per minutes?
Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per weeks to bushel per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per weeks and bushel per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000003199580678 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.