Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Seconds to Cubic yards per Millisecond Converter — bu/s to yd3/ms
Convert Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) to Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per seconds = 0.000046091 cubic yard per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Seconds to Cubic yards per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.03523907017 / 764.554858.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Seconds to Cubic yards per Millisecond
Bushel per Seconds and Cubic yard per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yards per millisecond = bushel per seconds × 0.0000460909636488
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per seconds equals 0.0352390701669 base units, and 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 764.554857984 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per seconds-to-cubic yard per millisecond factor of 0.0000460909636488.
Simple example
1 bu/s × 0.00004609096365 = 0.000046091 yd3/ms
1 bushel per seconds = 0.000046091 cubic yards per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/s × 0.00004609096365 = 0.0027654578 yd3/ms
60 bushel per seconds = 0.0027654578 cubic yards per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) | Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/s | 0.0000046091 yd3/ms |
| 1 bu/s | 0.000046091 yd3/ms |
| 10 bu/s | 0.0004609096 yd3/ms |
| 60 bu/s | 0.0027654578 yd3/ms |
| 100 bu/s | 0.0046090964 yd3/ms |
| 1,000 bu/s | 0.0460909637 yd3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds
0.000046091 yd3/ms × 21696.22678 = 1.000000789 bu/s
0.000046091 cubic yards per millisecond = 1.000000789 bushel per seconds.
bushel per seconds = cubic yards per millisecond × 21696.2267836
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds.
Understanding the Bushel per Seconds (bu/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yards per millisecond are in 1 bushel per seconds?
1 bushel per seconds equals 0.000046091 cubic yards per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per seconds to cubic yard per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per seconds value by 0.00004609096365. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per millisecond back to bushel per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 21,696.22678 bushel per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per seconds?
Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per millisecond?
Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per seconds to cubic yard per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per seconds and cubic yard per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00004609096365 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.