Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic yards per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds Converter — yd3/ms to bu/s
Convert Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) to Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic yard per millisecond = 21,696.22678 bushel per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic yards per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 764.554858 / 0.03523907017.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic yards per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds
Cubic yard per Millisecond and Bushel per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per seconds = cubic yards per millisecond × 21696.2267836
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 764.554857984 base units, and 1 bushel per seconds equals 0.0352390701669 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic yard per millisecond-to-bushel per seconds factor of 21696.2267836.
Simple example
1 yd3/ms × 21696.22678 = 21,696.22678 bu/s
1 cubic yard per millisecond = 21,696.22678 bushel per seconds.
Real-world example
60 yd3/ms × 21696.22678 = 1,301,773.607 bu/s
60 cubic yards per millisecond = 1,301,773.607 bushel per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) | Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 yd3/ms | 2,169.622678 bu/s |
| 1 yd3/ms | 21,696.22678 bu/s |
| 10 yd3/ms | 216,962.2678 bu/s |
| 60 yd3/ms | 1,301,773.607 bu/s |
| 100 yd3/ms | 2,169,622.678 bu/s |
| 1,000 yd3/ms | 21,696,226.78 bu/s |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Seconds to Cubic yard per Millisecond
1 bu/s × 0.00004609096365 = 0.000046091 yd3/ms
1 bushel per seconds = 0.000046091 cubic yards per millisecond.
cubic yards per millisecond = bushel per seconds × 0.0000460909636488
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Seconds to Cubic yard per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Seconds (bu/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per seconds are in 1 cubic yard per millisecond?
1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 21,696.22678 bushel per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic yard per millisecond to bushel per seconds?
Multiply the cubic yard per millisecond value by 21696.22678. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per seconds back to cubic yard per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per seconds equals 0.000046091 cubic yards per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic yard per millisecond?
Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per seconds?
Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic yard per millisecond to bushel per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic yard per millisecond and bushel per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 21696.22678 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.