Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond Converter — bu/wk to cm3/ms
Convert Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per weeks = 0.0000582657 cubic centimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 5.82656583e-8 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond
Bushel per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeters per millisecond = bushel per weeks × 0.0000582656583447
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per weeks equals 5.826566e-8 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per millisecond factor of 0.0000582656583447.
Simple example
1 bu/wk × 0.00005826565834 = 0.0000582657 cm3/ms
1 bushel per weeks = 0.0000582657 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/wk × 0.00005826565834 = 0.0034959395 cm3/ms
60 bushel per weeks = 0.0034959395 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/wk | 0.0000058266 cm3/ms |
| 1 bu/wk | 0.0000582657 cm3/ms |
| 10 bu/wk | 0.0005826566 cm3/ms |
| 60 bu/wk | 0.0034959395 cm3/ms |
| 100 bu/wk | 0.0058265658 cm3/ms |
| 1,000 bu/wk | 0.0582656583 cm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Bushel per Weeks
0.0000582657 cm3/ms × 17162.7684 = 1.000000715 bu/wk
0.0000582657 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 1.000000715 bushel per weeks.
bushel per weeks = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 17162.7684027
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Bushel per Weeks.
Understanding the Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeters per millisecond are in 1 bushel per weeks?
1 bushel per weeks equals 0.0000582657 cubic centimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per weeks to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per weeks value by 0.00005826565834. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond back to bushel per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 17,162.7684 bushel per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per weeks?
Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per weeks to cubic centimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per weeks and cubic centimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00005826565834 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.