Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Bushel per Weeks Converter — cm3/ms to bu/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) to Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per millisecond = 17,162.7684 bushel per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Bushel per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001 / 5.82656583e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Bushel per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond and Bushel per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per weeks = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 17162.7684027
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, and 1 bushel per weeks equals 5.826566e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per millisecond-to-bushel per weeks factor of 17162.7684027.
Simple example
1 cm3/ms × 17162.7684 = 17,162.7684 bu/wk
1 cubic centimeter per millisecond = 17,162.7684 bushel per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/ms × 17162.7684 = 1,029,766.104 bu/wk
60 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 1,029,766.104 bushel per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) | Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/ms | 1,716.27684 bu/wk |
| 1 cm3/ms | 17,162.7684 bu/wk |
| 10 cm3/ms | 171,627.684 bu/wk |
| 60 cm3/ms | 1,029,766.104 bu/wk |
| 100 cm3/ms | 1,716,276.84 bu/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/ms | 17,162,768.4 bu/wk |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond
1 bu/wk × 0.00005826565834 = 0.0000582657 cm3/ms
1 bushel per weeks = 0.0000582657 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
cubic centimeters per millisecond = bushel per weeks × 0.0000582656583447
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond?
1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 17,162.7684 bushel per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond to bushel per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per millisecond value by 17162.7684. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per weeks back to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per weeks equals 0.0000582657 cubic centimeters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per weeks?
Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per millisecond to bushel per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per millisecond and bushel per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 17162.7684 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.