Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds Converter — bu/wk to cm3/s
Convert Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per weeks = 0.0582656583 cubic centimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 5.82656583e-8 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
Bushel per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per seconds = bushel per weeks × 0.0582656583447
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per weeks equals 5.826566e-8 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per seconds factor of 0.0582656583447.
Simple example
1 bu/wk × 0.05826565834 = 0.0582656583 cm3/s
1 bushel per weeks = 0.0582656583 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 bu/wk × 0.05826565834 = 3.495939501 cm3/s
60 bushel per weeks = 3.495939501 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/wk | 0.0058265658 cm3/s |
| 1 bu/wk | 0.0582656583 cm3/s |
| 10 bu/wk | 0.5826565834 cm3/s |
| 60 bu/wk | 3.495939501 cm3/s |
| 100 bu/wk | 5.826565834 cm3/s |
| 1,000 bu/wk | 58.26565834 cm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Weeks
0.0582656583 cm3/s × 17.1627684 = 0.9999999992 bu/wk
0.0582656583 cubic centimeter per seconds = 0.9999999992 bushel per weeks.
bushel per weeks = cubic centimeter per seconds × 17.1627684027
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Weeks.
Understanding the Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per seconds are in 1 bushel per weeks?
1 bushel per weeks equals 0.0582656583 cubic centimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per weeks to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Multiply the bushel per weeks value by 0.05826565834. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds back to bushel per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 17.1627684 bushel per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per weeks?
Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per weeks to cubic centimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per weeks and cubic centimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.05826565834 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.