Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Weeks Converter — cm3/s to bu/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) to Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 17.1627684 bushel per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 5.82656583e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds and Bushel per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per weeks = cubic centimeter per seconds × 17.1627684027
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 bushel per weeks equals 5.826566e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per seconds-to-bushel per weeks factor of 17.1627684027.
Simple example
1 cm3/s × 17.1627684 = 17.1627684 bu/wk
1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 17.1627684 bushel per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/s × 17.1627684 = 1,029.766104 bu/wk
60 cubic centimeter per seconds = 1,029.766104 bushel per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) | Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/s | 1.71627684 bu/wk |
| 1 cm3/s | 17.1627684 bu/wk |
| 10 cm3/s | 171.627684 bu/wk |
| 60 cm3/s | 1,029.766104 bu/wk |
| 100 cm3/s | 1,716.27684 bu/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/s | 17,162.7684 bu/wk |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
17.1627684 bu/wk × 0.05826565834 = 0.9999999998 cm3/s
17.1627684 bushel per weeks = 0.9999999998 cubic centimeter per seconds.
cubic centimeter per seconds = bushel per weeks × 0.0582656583447
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per seconds?
1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 17.1627684 bushel per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds to bushel per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per seconds value by 17.1627684. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per weeks back to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per weeks equals 0.0582656583 cubic centimeter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per weeks?
Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per seconds to bushel per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per seconds and bushel per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 17.1627684 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.