Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds Converter — bu/wk to imp qt/s
Convert Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) to Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per weeks = 0.0000512666 imperial quart per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 5.82656583e-8 / 0.0011365225.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds
Bushel per Weeks and Imperial quart per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per seconds = bushel per weeks × 0.0000512666122709
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per weeks equals 5.826566e-8 base units, and 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per weeks-to-imperial quart per seconds factor of 0.0000512666122709.
Simple example
1 bu/wk × 0.00005126661227 = 0.0000512666 imp qt/s
1 bushel per weeks = 0.0000512666 imperial quart per seconds.
Real-world example
60 bu/wk × 0.00005126661227 = 0.0030759967 imp qt/s
60 bushel per weeks = 0.0030759967 imperial quart per seconds.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) | Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/wk | 0.0000051267 imp qt/s |
| 1 bu/wk | 0.0000512666 imp qt/s |
| 10 bu/wk | 0.0005126661 imp qt/s |
| 60 bu/wk | 0.0030759967 imp qt/s |
| 100 bu/wk | 0.0051266612 imp qt/s |
| 1,000 bu/wk | 0.0512666123 imp qt/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Seconds to Bushel per Weeks
0.0000512666 imp qt/s × 19505.87245 = 0.9999997606 bu/wk
0.0000512666 imperial quart per seconds = 0.9999997606 bushel per weeks.
bushel per weeks = imperial quart per seconds × 19505.8724519
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Seconds to Bushel per Weeks.
Understanding the Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per seconds are in 1 bushel per weeks?
1 bushel per weeks equals 0.0000512666 imperial quart per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per weeks to imperial quart per seconds?
Multiply the bushel per weeks value by 0.00005126661227. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds back to bushel per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 19,505.87245 bushel per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per weeks?
Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per weeks to imperial quart per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per weeks and imperial quart per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00005126661227 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.