Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Bushel per Weeks Converter — imp qt/s to bu/wk
Convert Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) to Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per seconds = 19,505.87245 bushel per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Seconds to Bushel per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0011365225 / 5.82656583e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Seconds to Bushel per Weeks
Imperial quart per Seconds and Bushel per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per weeks = imperial quart per seconds × 19505.8724519
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, and 1 bushel per weeks equals 5.826566e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per seconds-to-bushel per weeks factor of 19505.8724519.
Simple example
1 imp qt/s × 19505.87245 = 19,505.87245 bu/wk
1 imperial quart per seconds = 19,505.87245 bushel per weeks.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/s × 19505.87245 = 1,170,352.347 bu/wk
60 imperial quart per seconds = 1,170,352.347 bushel per weeks.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) | Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/s | 1,950.587245 bu/wk |
| 1 imp qt/s | 19,505.87245 bu/wk |
| 10 imp qt/s | 195,058.7245 bu/wk |
| 60 imp qt/s | 1,170,352.347 bu/wk |
| 100 imp qt/s | 1,950,587.245 bu/wk |
| 1,000 imp qt/s | 19,505,872.45 bu/wk |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds
1 bu/wk × 0.00005126661227 = 0.0000512666 imp qt/s
1 bushel per weeks = 0.0000512666 imperial quart per seconds.
imperial quart per seconds = bushel per weeks × 0.0000512666122709
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per weeks are in 1 imperial quart per seconds?
1 imperial quart per seconds equals 19,505.87245 bushel per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds to bushel per weeks?
Multiply the imperial quart per seconds value by 19505.87245. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per weeks back to imperial quart per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per weeks equals 0.0000512666 imperial quart per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per weeks?
Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per seconds to bushel per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per seconds and bushel per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 19505.87245 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.