Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Hours to Imperial quart per Decades Converter — cL/h to imp qt/decade
Convert Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) to Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per hours = 771.2843345 imperial quart per decades). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Hours to Imperial quart per Decades converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-9 / 3.60149643e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Hours to Imperial quart per Decades
Centiliter per Hours and Imperial quart per Decades both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per decades = centiliter per hours × 771.28433445
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per hours equals 2.777778e-9 base units, and 1 imperial quart per decades equals 3.601496e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per hours-to-imperial quart per decades factor of 771.28433445.
Simple example
1 cL/h × 771.2843345 = 771.2843345 imp qt/decade
1 centiliter per hours = 771.2843345 imperial quart per decades.
Real-world example
60 cL/h × 771.2843345 = 46,277.06007 imp qt/decade
60 centiliter per hours = 46,277.06007 imperial quart per decades.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) | Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/h | 77.12843345 imp qt/decade |
| 1 cL/h | 771.2843345 imp qt/decade |
| 10 cL/h | 7,712.843345 imp qt/decade |
| 60 cL/h | 46,277.06007 imp qt/decade |
| 100 cL/h | 77,128.43345 imp qt/decade |
| 1,000 cL/h | 771,284.3345 imp qt/decade |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Decades to Centiliter per Hours
771.2843345 imp qt/decade × 0.001296538715 = 1 cL/h
771.2843345 imperial quart per decades = 1 centiliter per hours.
centiliter per hours = imperial quart per decades × 0.00129653871515
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Decades to Centiliter per Hours.
Understanding the Centiliter per Hours (cL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per decades are in 1 centiliter per hours?
1 centiliter per hours equals 771.2843345 imperial quart per decades, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per hours to imperial quart per decades?
Multiply the centiliter per hours value by 771.2843345. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per decades back to centiliter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per decades equals 0.0012965387 centiliter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per hours?
Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per decades?
Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per hours to imperial quart per decades conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per hours and imperial quart per decades are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 771.2843345 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.