Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial quart per Decades to Centiliter per Hours Converter — imp qt/decade to cL/h
Convert Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade) to Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial quart per decades = 0.0012965387 centiliter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial quart per Decades to Centiliter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.60149643e-12 / 2.77777778e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial quart per Decades to Centiliter per Hours
Imperial quart per Decades and Centiliter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per hours = imperial quart per decades × 0.00129653871515
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial quart per decades equals 3.601496e-12 base units, and 1 centiliter per hours equals 2.777778e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial quart per decades-to-centiliter per hours factor of 0.00129653871515.
Simple example
1 imp qt/decade × 0.001296538715 = 0.0012965387 cL/h
1 imperial quart per decades = 0.0012965387 centiliter per hours.
Real-world example
60 imp qt/decade × 0.001296538715 = 0.0777923229 cL/h
60 imperial quart per decades = 0.0777923229 centiliter per hours.
Conversion table
| Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade) | Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp qt/decade | 0.0001296539 cL/h |
| 1 imp qt/decade | 0.0012965387 cL/h |
| 10 imp qt/decade | 0.0129653872 cL/h |
| 60 imp qt/decade | 0.0777923229 cL/h |
| 100 imp qt/decade | 0.1296538715 cL/h |
| 1,000 imp qt/decade | 1.296538715 cL/h |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Hours to Imperial quart per Decades
0.0012965387 cL/h × 771.2843345 = 0.9999999883 imp qt/decade
0.0012965387 centiliter per hours = 0.9999999883 imperial quart per decades.
imperial quart per decades = centiliter per hours × 771.28433445
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Hours to Imperial quart per Decades.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Hours (cL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per hours are in 1 imperial quart per decades?
1 imperial quart per decades equals 0.0012965387 centiliter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial quart per decades to centiliter per hours?
Multiply the imperial quart per decades value by 0.001296538715. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per hours back to imperial quart per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per hours equals 771.2843345 imperial quart per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial quart per decades?
Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per hours?
Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial quart per decades to centiliter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial quart per decades and centiliter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.001296538715 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.