Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliters per Millisecond to Cubic yard per Seconds Converter — cL/ms to yd3/s
Convert Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) to Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per millisecond = 0.0130795062 cubic yard per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliters per Millisecond to Cubic yard per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.01 / 0.764554858.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliters per Millisecond to Cubic yard per Seconds
Centiliter per Millisecond and Cubic yard per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yard per seconds = centiliters per millisecond × 0.0130795061931
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.01 base units, and 1 cubic yard per seconds equals 0.764554857984 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per millisecond-to-cubic yard per seconds factor of 0.0130795061931.
Simple example
1 cL/ms × 0.01307950619 = 0.0130795062 yd3/s
1 centiliter per millisecond = 0.0130795062 cubic yard per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cL/ms × 0.01307950619 = 0.7847703716 yd3/s
60 centiliters per millisecond = 0.7847703716 cubic yard per seconds.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) | Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/ms | 0.0013079506 yd3/s |
| 1 cL/ms | 0.0130795062 yd3/s |
| 10 cL/ms | 0.1307950619 yd3/s |
| 60 cL/ms | 0.7847703716 yd3/s |
| 100 cL/ms | 1.307950619 yd3/s |
| 1,000 cL/ms | 13.07950619 yd3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Seconds to Centiliter per Millisecond
0.0130795062 yd3/s × 76.4554858 = 1.000000001 cL/ms
0.0130795062 cubic yard per seconds = 1.000000001 centiliters per millisecond.
centiliters per millisecond = cubic yard per seconds × 76.4554857984
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Seconds to Centiliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yard per seconds are in 1 centiliter per millisecond?
1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.0130795062 cubic yard per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per millisecond to cubic yard per seconds?
Multiply the centiliter per millisecond value by 0.01307950619. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per seconds back to centiliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per seconds equals 76.4554858 centiliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per millisecond?
Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per seconds?
Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per millisecond to cubic yard per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per millisecond and cubic yard per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.01307950619 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.