Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic yard per Seconds to Centiliters per Millisecond Converter — yd3/s to cL/ms
Convert Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s) to Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic yard per seconds = 76.4554858 centiliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic yard per Seconds to Centiliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.764554858 / 0.01.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic yard per Seconds to Centiliters per Millisecond
Cubic yard per Seconds and Centiliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliters per millisecond = cubic yard per seconds × 76.4554857984
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic yard per seconds equals 0.764554857984 base units, and 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.01 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic yard per seconds-to-centiliter per millisecond factor of 76.4554857984.
Simple example
1 yd3/s × 76.4554858 = 76.4554858 cL/ms
1 cubic yard per seconds = 76.4554858 centiliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 yd3/s × 76.4554858 = 4,587.329148 cL/ms
60 cubic yard per seconds = 4,587.329148 centiliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s) | Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 yd3/s | 7.64554858 cL/ms |
| 1 yd3/s | 76.4554858 cL/ms |
| 10 yd3/s | 764.554858 cL/ms |
| 60 yd3/s | 4,587.329148 cL/ms |
| 100 yd3/s | 7,645.54858 cL/ms |
| 1,000 yd3/s | 76,455.4858 cL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Millisecond to Cubic yard per Seconds
76.4554858 cL/ms × 0.01307950619 = 1 yd3/s
76.4554858 centiliters per millisecond = 1 cubic yard per seconds.
cubic yard per seconds = centiliters per millisecond × 0.0130795061931
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Millisecond to Cubic yard per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliters per millisecond are in 1 cubic yard per seconds?
1 cubic yard per seconds equals 76.4554858 centiliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic yard per seconds to centiliter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic yard per seconds value by 76.4554858. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per millisecond back to cubic yard per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.0130795062 cubic yard per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic yard per seconds?
Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per millisecond?
Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic yard per seconds to centiliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic yard per seconds and centiliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 76.4554858 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.