Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliters per Millisecond to Gallons per Millisecond Converter — cL/ms to gal/ms
Convert Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) to Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per millisecond = 0.0026417205 gallon per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliters per Millisecond to Gallons per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.01 / 3.785411784.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliters per Millisecond to Gallons per Millisecond
Centiliter per Millisecond and Gallon per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
gallons per millisecond = centiliters per millisecond × 0.00264172052358
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.01 base units, and 1 gallon per millisecond equals 3.785411784 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per millisecond-to-gallon per millisecond factor of 0.00264172052358.
Simple example
1 cL/ms × 0.002641720524 = 0.0026417205 gal/ms
1 centiliter per millisecond = 0.0026417205 gallons per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cL/ms × 0.002641720524 = 0.1585032314 gal/ms
60 centiliters per millisecond = 0.1585032314 gallons per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) | Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/ms | 0.0002641721 gal/ms |
| 1 cL/ms | 0.0026417205 gal/ms |
| 10 cL/ms | 0.0264172052 gal/ms |
| 60 cL/ms | 0.1585032314 gal/ms |
| 100 cL/ms | 0.2641720524 gal/ms |
| 1,000 cL/ms | 2.641720524 gal/ms |
Reverse conversion: Gallon per Millisecond to Centiliter per Millisecond
0.0026417205 gal/ms × 378.5411784 = 0.9999999911 cL/ms
0.0026417205 gallons per millisecond = 0.9999999911 centiliters per millisecond.
centiliters per millisecond = gallons per millisecond × 378.5411784
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Gallon per Millisecond to Centiliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many gallons per millisecond are in 1 centiliter per millisecond?
1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.0026417205 gallons per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per millisecond to gallon per millisecond?
Multiply the centiliter per millisecond value by 0.002641720524. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert gallon per millisecond back to centiliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 gallon per millisecond equals 378.5411784 centiliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per millisecond?
Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a gallon per millisecond?
Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per millisecond to gallon per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per millisecond and gallon per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.002641720524 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.