Volumetric flow rate.
Gallons per Millisecond to Centiliters per Millisecond Converter — gal/ms to cL/ms
Convert Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) to Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 gallon per millisecond = 378.5411784 centiliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Gallons per Millisecond to Centiliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.785411784 / 0.01.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Gallons per Millisecond to Centiliters per Millisecond
Gallon per Millisecond and Centiliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliters per millisecond = gallons per millisecond × 378.5411784
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 gallon per millisecond equals 3.785411784 base units, and 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.01 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct gallon per millisecond-to-centiliter per millisecond factor of 378.5411784.
Simple example
1 gal/ms × 378.5411784 = 378.5411784 cL/ms
1 gallon per millisecond = 378.5411784 centiliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 gal/ms × 378.5411784 = 22,712.4707 cL/ms
60 gallons per millisecond = 22,712.4707 centiliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) | Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 gal/ms | 37.85411784 cL/ms |
| 1 gal/ms | 378.5411784 cL/ms |
| 10 gal/ms | 3,785.411784 cL/ms |
| 60 gal/ms | 22,712.4707 cL/ms |
| 100 gal/ms | 37,854.11784 cL/ms |
| 1,000 gal/ms | 378,541.1784 cL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Millisecond to Gallon per Millisecond
378.5411784 cL/ms × 0.002641720524 = 1 gal/ms
378.5411784 centiliters per millisecond = 1 gallon per millisecond.
gallons per millisecond = centiliters per millisecond × 0.00264172052358
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Millisecond to Gallon per Millisecond.
Understanding the Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliters per millisecond are in 1 gallon per millisecond?
1 gallon per millisecond equals 378.5411784 centiliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert gallon per millisecond to centiliter per millisecond?
Multiply the gallon per millisecond value by 378.5411784. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per millisecond back to gallon per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.0026417205 gallons per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a gallon per millisecond?
Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per millisecond?
Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the gallon per millisecond to centiliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both gallon per millisecond and centiliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 378.5411784 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.