Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — cL/s to ft3/ms
Convert Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per seconds = 3.531467e-7 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-5 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Centiliter per Seconds and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = centiliter per seconds × 3.531467e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per seconds-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 3.531467e-7.
Simple example
1 cL/s × 3.531467e-7 = 3.531467e-7 ft3/ms
1 centiliter per seconds = 3.531467e-7 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cL/s × 3.531467e-7 = 0.0000211888 ft3/ms
60 centiliter per seconds = 0.0000211888 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/s | 3.531467e-8 ft3/ms |
| 1 cL/s | 3.531467e-7 ft3/ms |
| 10 cL/s | 0.0000035315 ft3/ms |
| 60 cL/s | 0.0000211888 ft3/ms |
| 100 cL/s | 0.0000353147 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 cL/s | 0.0003531467 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Centiliter per Seconds
3.531467e-7 ft3/ms × 2831684.659 = 1.000000093 cL/s
3.531467e-7 cubic feet per millisecond = 1.000000093 centiliter per seconds.
centiliter per seconds = cubic feet per millisecond × 2831684.6592
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Centiliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 centiliter per seconds?
1 centiliter per seconds equals 3.531467e-7 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the centiliter per seconds value by 3.531467e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to centiliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 2,831,684.659 centiliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per seconds to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per seconds and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.531467e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.